menu
Subscribe
Code of ethics

Independence, accuracy, and accountability

Our mission demands that readers, sources, and funders have confidence in the accuracy of our research, the fairness of our process, and the independence of our conclusions.

Our business model and independence

Our revenue is designed to protect editorial and research independence. The more diverse our revenue sources, the stronger our independence and long-term sustainability.

NONPROFIT REVENUE

  • Foundation and institutional grants
  • Individual donations from readers and community supporters
  • Future newsletter sponsorships and data licensing, always clearly separated from editorial content

EDSMART.ORG (SEPARATE FOR-PROFIT)

Commercial revenue (advertising, affiliate partnerships, sponsorships, and data products) is handled exclusively by EDsmart.org. Pathways and Outcomes does not carry display advertising or education-vendor sponsorships on this site.

  • We produce independent research and reporting
  • EDsmart may distribute or cite our work to its audience
  • EDsmart revenue does not fund or influence our findings
  • A written MOU governs the relationship; conflicts are disclosed publicly

Our research is accurate

  • We check facts before publication and correct errors transparently at corrections@pathwaysandoutcomes.org
  • We never plagiarize or deliberately distort facts, data, or context, including charts and visualizations
  • We identify sources of information and seek independent verification when possible
  • We acknowledge uncertainty and limitations in our findings

Our research is transparent

  • We identify ourselves openly and never misrepresent who we are
  • We prefer on-the-record sources; anonymous sources require editor approval
  • We actively seek perspectives from families, students, workers, and counselors, not only officials
  • We publish methodology alongside data-driven work: sources, methods, assumptions, and limitations

Our conclusions are independent

We provide balanced, fact-based research aimed at informing decisions, not advancing a predetermined conclusion. We do not take a position on the best pathway to opportunity. We follow the evidence.

Team members will not accept gifts or favors from sources, work on projects with undisclosed conflicts of interest, give favored treatment to donors, or participate in political campaigning or endorsements.

Our donors do not influence our work

  • We may accept funding for topic areas we would investigate anyway. Never for specific story ideas or predetermined conclusions
  • Feedback from supporters is treated like any other input; editorial decisions are ours alone
  • We disclose gifts larger than $1,000 to staff and the public
  • We do not shy away from covering institutions or programs that fund us; we disclose the relationship

Use of artificial intelligence

During our launch phase, we use AI tools to help draft written content, including data briefs and reports. AI may also assist research, analysis, and production workflows. This is a temporary capacity measure until we can hire writers and journalists.

Human editors remain responsible for every published word. We verify data, sources, and claims before release. AI output is never published without human review and editing.

We disclose this practice on our About page and in our Editorial Policy so readers, sources, and funders understand how our work is produced today.

Accountability

We welcome questions, criticism, corrections, and feedback.

See also Editorial Policy, Methodology, and Funding transparency.